Feeds:
Posts
Comments

The original purpose behind the European Union was simply to keep member countries from starting wars with each other. At the time, competing economically as a unified entity was seen as a secondary bonus.

But now the recent spread of populist nationalism, presidents emerging with autocratic ambitions, the Brexit blow-up in the UK, and Trump’s affection for dictators and daily generated chaos, are all coming together to threaten the existence of the EU… and much more.

Add to this U.S. arms sales to Saudi Arabia, a new Trump dictated military relationship with nationalistic Poland, an unstable Israeli government, a provoked and dangerous Iran, a nuclear-loaded maniac in North Korea, a festering and disintegrating Venezuela, an energized and politically meddling Russia, a determined and aggressive China, a still very frightening Syria, and more… and suddenly you have a world literally on the edge of destroying itself.

All this has been analyzed in past posts. So all I can say now is someone better do something… and quick.

Admittedly a good speech was read by the U.S. president at the 75th anniversary of the Normandy invasion.  But…

BUT this speech was written for him. And he read it against the backdrop of a UK visit marked by ego-flexing, politics meddling, and confusion-generating remarks… a behavior that produced an all time low point in the relationship with our most loyal ally. All the while the Queen was doing everything possible to be gracious and classy.

And then later in a Fox News interview, with Normandy tombstones as his backdrop, the president aimed his most vindictive and cruel name-calling rampage yet at the highest ranking woman in the American government. This craziness simply needs to stop.

 

The first issue demanding resolution is not “the power of the executive branch versus the oversight role of Congress.” Settling this Constitution interpretation-based argument is certainly a close second, but it’s not the first.

The very first issue requiring resolution is the constant political proliferation of lies, cruelty, bullying, and deliberate spreading of chaos and confusion. The Declaration of Independence freed us from such tyranny, and our future as a unified nation of laws and personal freedom demands an immediate correction.

 

 

Convincing facts are already in the Mueller report. So maybe an alternative to impeachment proceedings is worth considering. In fact, a carefully prepared strategic communication plan might even work better than impeachment. Consider a preparation process that could look something like this:

1. Identify the obstruction and collusion descriptions in the Mueller report and ask the most competent committee members to each select one, and then write a report to be presented at a hearing.

2. Use scheduled hearings to have these reports presented and discussed… one report at each hearing. Invite the public to respond.

3. Also, prepare a concise press release for each report, and follow with major announcements through news and social media channels, including press conferences when the issue warrants.

4. For the presidential candidates, use this press release to prepare talking points on each report.

5. Ask them to reference each announcement as its made, but to still emphasize their big vision for the future, and action plans for the issues they see as most critical, i.e. jobs, healthcare, climate change, infrastructure, housing, taxes, etc.

A focus on impeachment at this time could end up mostly as a distraction. But a focus on what is already in the Mueller report might be a real opportunity to underscore all the substance necessary for a winning strategic communication plan.

Sometime ago I wrote a book about internal politics in universities. The project included a study of leadership styles. Among those styles was the “autocrat.” I found that some people simply feel more secure working under a leader who makes all the important decisions, even when that security often turns out to be imagined.

Many of these people have military experience, or at least admire military-type organizations. They are willing to follow directives on a daily basis, and embrace a culture of disciplined personal behavior… one that defers to a chief executive’s mandates and the instructions of managers and supervisors.

Apparently, we have a White House today that attracts people who prefer feeling this kind of security… that is as long as the commander in chief’s wrath is not being felt directly, and the work situation feels important enough.

After the Iraq war, and Saddam Hussein was finally deposed, many small businessmen said it was actually better for them before the war. The tyrant did not bother them and their businesses were moving along just fine. If there is a place that feels secure enough, many people decide they are just fine with a dictator.

When he was a presidential candidate, Senator Lindsey Graham said very nasty things about Donald Trump’s character. But now he supports him. Graham always admired the military, so maybe many of us just missed noticing that he always has preferred autocratic environments. Maybe now he even has his eye on ending his career in a secure-feeling executive position in such a White House. And maybe we even have an Attorney General who has the same kind of future in mind for himself.

Most management experts, however, think that a democratic approach to leadership results in much better problem-solving. In institutions and governments, these leaders prefer to seek out the most experienced minds they can find, and arrive at decisions based on their best collective thinking. These leaders facilitate participatory processes, listen before acting, and believe in strong teams.

In a democratic organization, the leader generally assumes the role of articulating the vision. But a talented executive team is always counted on to help find the best ways to make that vision real. Loyalty is earned this way… and it is always returned with sincere gratitude.

The current White House, with the help of a significant portion of the Republican Partly, has become a dictatorial autocracy. And while a few Americans might prefer this type of governance, we are the United States of America… and have a Declaration of Independence that flatly rejects autocracies in any form. You see… it’s the lies, chaos, greed, and cruelty that come with them that make them so divisive. And history clearly teaches that over time, autocrats always end up destroying their nations.

When do congressional investigators get tired of their own daily rants and give in to defeat? Or, how will they know when they are making enough progress that reaching a “tipping point” is realistic?

Our president is currently using Twitter to intimidate both his Congressional adversaries and supporters. He generates daily chaos, and then refuses to cooperate. He turns down all requests for information, and all invitations to testify. It’s a bully tactic that halts all progress, results in lengthy legal battles, and might buy him time until the 2020 election.

But never ending lies and attacks have an accumulative effect, and people will eventually tire of the constant meanness. It’s an inevitable feature of basic communication dynamics.

So the strategy for investigators must be to not hurry the process, employ a business-like tone everyday, and simply take one careful step at a time… all the while looking for small signs of a “tipping point,” and being ready to act when the time comes.

Oh, and there is one more communication dynamics feature: When colleagues finally do reach a tipping point and shift quickly from supporter to critic, they usually do so with deep feelings of disgust for their leader’s past behavior.

 

Without truth and facts on the table the political process becomes pure fiction. If this was a Netflix series, it would be wildly entertaining. But this is the United States of America, and the resulting gridlock has become life-threatening to the republic most Americans hold dear.

The White House calls the news media “fake news.” At the same time, lies and personal attacks coming from the White House are “fake news.”  And when you add the fake news streaming from political adversaries and foreign countries, you have nothing short of a fictional adventure novel!

Campaigns are expensive. Instead of passing good legislation, legislators spend much of their week making donor calls and visiting with lobbyists… quickly becoming indebted to them. And making donor wishes a legislative priority mostly results in more fiction.

Lies, innuendos, exaggerations, personal attacks, conspiracies, and rumors, are all contaminating the entire political system. Both parties are responsible. And both are equally guilty.

Our country’s only hope is a complete change of people, culture, and expertise in the White House… and a whole new set of truth-committed, values motivated, “statesmen” setting the agenda in Congress.

Before it’s too late, we simply must find and support the right candidates for 2020. And then, we need to make damn sure they get elected!