Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘Branding’ Category

In preparation for a presentation I will be making in Australia, I have been reviewing some current university marketing materials. I was reminded that not too long ago, we could not even utter the word “marketing” on some campuses. Now, it can be quite striking to see how far some institutions have come.  In fact, I actually found myself asking: Have some of my professional colleagues gone too far?

Cute tag-lines with little content or substance abound. My contention all along has been that no tag-line is better than just a cute one. Cute gets old fast, every time! Tag-lines must connect so well to an institution’s mission that they cleverly sum-up the true essence of the place. Otherwise, they serve no real purpose. Some institutions are using athletic mascots in their advertising to symbolically stand for the entire institution. But here I found myself asking: Is this the best symbol for the institution’s long-term academic reputation building?  Others are using design so trendy that it’s difficult to see how their materials accurately represent their institution’s mission and vision.

Dont get me wrong. Especially in this digital world, I do believe we need to “look” innovative. In order to connect with our audiences we must be able to demonstrate a state-of-the-art understanding of technology, and of our constituents’ needs and interests. But the question for the academy remains:  How do we do that and still represent the traditions and substance and what academic work is really all about?

We are advancing an industry with significant historical relevance. There is nothing else in society quite like the academy. It’s traditions of academic freedom and constructive debate require continuing explanation. It remains the custodian of the lessons of history and the best thinking of mankind. Indeed, reminding each generation of the very definition of  a fully “educated person,” is also our ongoing challenge. 

All of this today certainly does require a measure of  innovation. The first chancellor I would work  with on meeting this challenge would often say to me:  OK, Lauer, we will try this idea, but not that one!”  I often felt I was being held back. But now I appreciate what I learned from that struggle to fully explain what I was trying to do.

Maintaining the heritage of this entire academic enterprise will require a certain amount of elegance. We must find a way to “look” imaginative and creative without  going over-the-top. This is why I now argue that we must adapt the profession of marketing to the academy. We are not selling an academic shopping center.  What we do must begin as a “way of thinking.” and not end up as a road to commercialization.

We need to connect with our constituents where they are, no doubt about it. But, then we must go on to take them to a better understanding of this wonderful world of ideas, and the unique role our institution intends to play in it. Honest communication that is more imaginative than cute should be the rule of the day.  Simply put, to be true to our heritage our marketing must be “appropriate.”

Read Full Post »

Of course, I would be thinking about football again. Who wouldn’t?  TCU just won the Rose Bowl, and questions abound about what this means for a high quality academic institution!

Some call this historic contest “the granddaddy of them all!”  In fact, the day after the game a New York Times article declared that with  this victory TCU “solidified its standing as one of the elite programs in all of college football.”

New visibility is happening nationwide, and that is truly exciting.  But this win is also a big challenge to keep it all in perspective. The real benefit is that such a victory definitely opens the door for more communication. But it therefore becomes critically important that all areas of the institution are prepared  to walk through that door and tell the institution’s unique and compelling academic story.

For all this to happen effectively, the athletic program must stay “integrated” with the insitution as a whole. This means that its management and coaching staff must reflect the leadership style and quality of the institution. Its’ brand identity and design must also convey that this is one institution, not two. An athletic program absolutely must not “look” and function like a separate organization. 

Athletic staff should promote campus and academic programs at games, and university marketing people should incorporate the vitality and benefits of college athletics into academic and campus materials.  Also, behaviors of fans should match the cultural values of the institution, since realistic lessons about winning and losing are important for everyone. The bottom line is that the ability of athletics to bring vitality to the total campus experience can be extremely positive, but making it happen is an integrated, campus-wide enterprise.  

Too often, however, althetic programs lose perspective. They operate as separate organizations. In fact, one college president once told me he didn’t even want his athletic program to be associated with his institution! In my way of thinking, there is no way to justify the existence of such a program.

This win was incredibly positive for TCU, there is no doubt about it. The visibiity and name recognition we are enjoying is beyond imagination.  But it is more clear to me than ever that academic, ethical, and financial integrity must be preserved. Only then will everyone continue to benefit.

Read Full Post »

It’s always easier to write a long essay than it is to produce an accurate, concise one.  It also always seems more professional to produce a  complicated strategic plan than a simple action outline.   

In fact, many consultants feel they must provide pages and pages of analysis and recommentations.  This, it seems, is the best way to demonstrate their depth of knowledge and to justify their fee. The fact is that many of these plans are too complicated to implement, and fail to provide a simple road map ahead.

For me, the mark of a true professional is an ability to absorb and comprehend complicated details, and then present a perceptive and concise review of the situation, identify the most effective message points, and describe a few basic action initiatives that will most effectively move the organization forward.

Most organizations have collected more programs than are really needed. In fact, many activities may be needlessly draining resouces, talent and energy.  Deciding what not to do, however, often proves to be more difficult than adding new things to do. In time, by adding more and more programs, many organizations have actually drifted away from their most productive mission and vision.

The key is to simply answer these questions: Is this program or activity directly related to our core business? Are others doing it better? Is it an essential revenue source?  Answering these questions should make the decisions you need to make about your “product” line very clear.

Your brand is your “differentiated identity.” We have argued in other posts that clarifying it is the ultimate key to success. The programs and message points that collectively establish this identity are the ones you want to preserve.  Now, stay focused on them.

Over time, all organizations collect unecessary publications and engage in needless communication activities.  You will probably want to keep a “branding piece” that establishes your market position. In addition, you may also want to have a piece for each major “sub-brand” program and activity.  If you determine you need a tangible “hold in your hands” symbol,  you may still want a few printed pieces. But most other communication can take electronic form these days, especially current news and information about your institution. 

Segment and prioritize your markets and use only the media that each  segment prefers. Usually this will be a combination of both new and traditional multi-media platforms, and they should be focused to converge simultaneously on each segment. Remember more is not better in an already information-cluttered world. Concise, focused, repeated interactive messages is what you will need for success.

All these points have been individually discussed, or will be, in other posts. The point of this one is simple! Although it isn’t easy, simplicity is essential. And then staying focused is absolutely required.

Read Full Post »

My university is having a fantastic year in football.  We are undefeated and number 3 in the nation! For professionals in marketing and communication, this always means questions from almost eveyone about just what it all means for advancing an academic institution? 

Does it help student recruiting?  How about fund raising? And what about building  academic reputation?

With respect to student recruiting, a sustained winning streak can certainly help stimulate more applications. For some universities, unneeded applications may just add overhead processing costs. For many others, however, a well developed marketing and communication program can use this new found positive visibility to effectively target appropriate market segments with an impressive academic story.

A winning season certainly stiumlates fund raising for athletics. But what about support for academic programs? Here too experience teaches that a professional advancement staff can use a very positive overall alumni atmosphere to steer donors toward academic programs. How well this works, however, will depend on the make-up of the donor base and the priorities of the immediate fund raising campaign.

The matter of how well winning athletics can help build academic reputation is more uncertain.  Athletics imagery alone does not advance academics, but it can convey a tone of campus vitality and welcoming community. And when the marketing and communication staff is prepared to target appropriate media and specific image influencing audiences with well crafted, interactive, relationship-building, academic messages, visibility and name recognition will certainly be an advantage.

In addition to being undefeated, our last several winning seasons have been challenging the BCS control of the national championship game. This produced significant visibility for us in Washington, DC, where I have been spending a lot of time these days. I have been able to witness first-hand how this ongoing visibility helped open the door to educational and political opinion leaders, and how effective it has been when we walked right through telling the rest of the academic story.

The bottom line lesson here, then, is that a winning athletics program provides visibility and opens doors, but only highly professional marketing, communication, admissions, and development work can sustain enrollment and fund raisng over time, and build lasting academic reputation.

Read Full Post »

Is there a best way to organize a marketing and communication operation in a university or nonprofit institution?  I am asked this question frequently, and the answer is no.

Every organization has differences in management and leadership styles, in immediate marketing and commmunication needs, in quantity and location of necessary talent, and in established ways of getting things done.  The best way to launch a new marketing initiative in this setting is not to immediately restructure. Rather, it is much better to use dotted lines and teams to create an integrated planning process that can begin working immediately. The best permanent organizational structure will then emerge over time.

Not long ago the university advancement profession argued that the best way to organize marketing and communication was to put it with alumni relations and fund raising under the leadership of the chief advancement officer.  The “model” was referred to as the “three-legged stool.” Admittedly, sometimes in some instutitions this structure works well.  But success depends greatly on the background and interests of the person in charge.

If the chief advancment officer is consumed with fund raising pressures, as many are, this structure will not work as well as it should. In addition to alumni relations and fund raising, marketing and communication professionals must also give significant attention to student recruiting, to promoting the schools and colleges, to institutional reputation building, to overall visibility activities and events, and to issues and crises management.

Marketing and communication professionals must be led by someone who will relentlessly champion their support throughout the institution, and will represent them enthusiastically on the president’s team.  For many academic institutions, the most effective structure will be for marketing and communication to be its own division with its own cabinet-level leadership.

I have recently been working with a professional association where many of the areas typically in a marketing and communication operation are spread over several administrative departments. Due to long established relationships, it was clear that the only way to move forward was to establish an association-wide marketing task force.  With this approach, I have no doubt that the best structure will emerge over time.

There is much to be learned about the dynamics of organizational processes, and the politics of gaining widespread support for sophisticated marketing and communication.  Experience teaches, however, that there is no one best model. Organizations that on the surface seem similar still have very different management cultures and marketing needs.

Read Full Post »

This week I found myself reflecting on all the travel I do, and I realized what I like mostly about it is just absorbing the everyday experiences of the people and the culture… observing what people are doing, seeing how they look, and fnding out what they are thinking is what interests me most.

It also occured to me how similar this is to discovering the essence of the brand identity for a university, and for many other organizations. It indeed is very challenging to find brand differentiation in very similar organizations. University and other institutional benefits descriptions can all sound alike. After all,  many have similar programs, offer similar activities, and even have similar quality goals.

I believe the very essence of the fabric of an institution is revealed only when spending time walking around, watching the behavior of people, having coffee or lunch, asking about experiences, absorbing the culture, and noting how values are acted out in day-to-day activities. You will find that many times those values are in fact shaped by local geography and the social traditions that have enolved over the years from founding missions.

Location, culture, and values enable discovering the differentiated and substantive brand identities of the largest, most comprehensive, institutions. And just spending time there observing, absorbing, and taking detailed notes, can give you all you need to know.

Some “tourists,” and many brand specialists, make sure to see all the attractions of a destination and then find that most offer the same features.  But others prefer to just be there for a while, and thereby come to know the true character of the place.  Culture and character, then, well communicated, can be the differentating factors in a destination’s brand distinction, and that is also very true for institutions.

Read Full Post »

This week the president of an association I am currently working with enthusiastically declared: “I am amazed. Our integrated marketing initiative is actually transforming this organization!”

Over the years the program heads in this association had created isolated silos. Most worked in the same building, yet each developed and promoted new initiatives independently. They did little market research, very little multi-platform communication planning, and felt no need to advance an integrated brand identity for the entire association.  They complained about getting little “promotion” support, which they  believed was the main problem when a program was not working well. 

Now, this president is amazed at how integration is bringing about productive organizational change. Whether or not integrated marketing truly is “transforming” really depends of how you define transform. There is little doubt, however, that with strong visionary leadership, organizations can evolve from their founding mission toward a bigger vision, so long as that vision is both realistic and inspiring. And this evolution can certainly be nurtured, facilitated, and accelerated though the professional use of integrated group processes.

Task forces, with sub-groups focused on special needs, can be very effective in getting key people on the same message page and moving the institution forward. Research and other action teams can assess market needs and identify competitive strengths. Focus groups can fine-tune the brand and set simple guidelines for the effective use of logos and design.

Eventually the result is a critical mass of energized opinion leaders on an accelerated “train” now headed toward a more exciting destination. And when that train starts moving, all the travelers on it begin to feel positive change and a new sense of personal and professional satisfaction.

Those skeptics left standing on the platform either jump on board at the last minute, or are simply left behind.  Many just become “dead wood,” and eventually a different kind of management problem. Others merely head off in a different direction, which in the long run will turn out to be good for them, and for the organization.  

Oh, and I should add that this president also said: “Several months ago I would have never believed this could happen. This is truly exciting!”

Read Full Post »

I was reminded of this essential lesson this week during a float trip down the Snake River in Wyoming.

Besides being a skilled river pilot, our guide was immersed in the unique authenticity of his, and now our, surroundings. He told us about the dramatically changing geology, endless plant life, the trees, the incredible variety of wildlife, the countless number of birds– including the majestic bald eagle, and  how a culture and a unique set of values evolved around river life. This young man was a total product of this very unique and special land and he could explain it all with passion and authenticity. He clarified the brand identity of the Snake River for us.

Organizations are much like this river. Most originated and have evolved around a very special set of unique factors. They develop a culture and a set of values, and have unique characteristics and strengths that literally define the direction they must go.

Their founding missions address an unmet need and then evolve into a culture, with a set of values, which in turn attract and influence special types of people. This mission can be guided through change with relevant visions, but organizations cannot be made into something they are not.

For example, I have found that those academic leaders who have tried to remake their institution into their own idea about what a university should be, invaribly fail. The dynamics of institutions take on a life of their own. 

Brand identities therefore must be authentic. They must be grounded in the founding mission and culture of their specific institution. They should incorporate an inspiring vision for an exciting future, but that vision must stay true to the unique character, culture, strengths  and values of the founding mission of the institution.  

Just like the Snake River, institutions take on a life of their own, and shape the people who inhabit them.

Read Full Post »

Over the years I have come to believe that an organization’s brand is often its primary product. Executives think that what they need most is more program promotion but the real issue is to first clarify and intensify their brand appeal. 

In the case of universities, it’s true that most prospective students and parents are very interested in the quality of acadmic programs, and they are especially so if they know the student’s primary areas of interest. But I still suggest that much of their final choice will be based on the emotional satisfaction and pride they experience in associating with the institution’s overall identity.

I even found this brand power focus to be true when working with community organizations. For example, I was the chairman of the board of a community theatre a few years ago in a town with a number of other theaters. Here I became accutely aware that season ticket sales were often based on being associated with a particular theater. In many cases this was even more so than the desire to attend specific plays.  It was clear to me that each theater in this town had a unique brand identity defined in part by the decor of its physical home, the types of people who regularly attended, the style of favored productions, the nature of social opportunities, and even the personality of the managing director. Selling this theater was a matter of clarifying its overall brand appeal.

The examples are endless.  I am struck by the degree to which many people pick their professional association mostly based on brand identity.  Even though we are tempted to focus first on specific program benefits, I submit that the pride of associating with these particular people and with this particular organization is often the most compelling factor. Consciously or subconsciously I am asking: Is this the organization where I can complete my professional identity and achieve leadership recognition in my field?  So before selling memberships I will first want to focus on clarifying and fine-tuning the brand.

Usually organizations approach me primarily to help them promote their programs, services, and events.  But I now quickly turn the conversation to considering why someone would want to be associated with this organization in the first place, and what is the exact nature of the emotional satsisfaction they will feel?  In short, I tell them we first need to clarify your brand.

Read Full Post »

Many university and nonprofit executives begin strategic planning by first listing the other similar institutions they admire– often referred to as “aspirant” institutions. They also list their direct competitors. Then they carefully study all the operations from top to bottom.

They study structures, staffing, salaries, HR practices, policies, marketing programs, budgets, all numerical success indicators, and more.

But this kind of benchmarking can be dangerous and misleading.  It can mislead because it can steer you directly into copying “best practices” and  blindly becoming just like the organizations on your aspirant and competitor lists.  When that happens your institution will always be number two and never have a truly distinct market position. 

Your study of other organizations should therefore be focused firmly on finding out how you can distinguish your institution from the others. You must find specific ways to behave differently. You should be searching for that very special market niche that allows you to be both different and better in some unique and compelling way.

Insead business school professors W. Chan Kim and Renee Mauborgne wrote a book called Blue Ocean Strategy: How to Create Uncontested Market Space and Make the Competition Irrelevant.   It is a brilliant description of how your organization with enough determination can find and reinforce that special difference that will allow you not to meet the competition head-on,  but rather to find the “blue ocean” and sail right past all your competitors on your way to an uncontested  number one!

Being the best in the world is simply a matter of finding your difference, being damn good at developing and polishing it, and then mobilizing  everyone inside and out to help tell the story!

Read Full Post »

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »