Social media empowers extremists…
Hopes that these new tools would make society work better quickly melted away. Instead, lies, conspiracies, and personal attacks, became commonplace. Too many people no longer trusted experts, became confused about facts, and began to rely on information sources that reinforced what they wanted to believe.
What’s more, social media enabled a reality TV show host without character or ethics to become president… and to turn his long-demonstrated autocratic methods into a very large cult following. He told us both in words and deeds exactly who he was… but too many chose to ignore it.
Traditional news organizations, committed to finding and reporting truth, quickly found their influence declining. Some saw opportunities for commercial success. As a result, many television networks turned their anchors into stars, reduced hard news content, added more commercials, and increased “happy talk” segments. All this, while white supremacists and anarchists were using social media to become leaders inside their own violence-prone tribes.
Other news organization found commercial success by becoming a mouthpiece for a president whose tweeted rants helped increase their ratings. Ambitious politicians also were finding that weaponizing social media could be a pathway to satisfying their thirst for power. Former Republican leaders found the president’s autocracy preferences acceptable… especially when it put them close to power.
At the same time, foreign governments were using the Internet to disrupt societies and influence elections. Tragically, the U.S. President and others found that they could use this to their advantage. So Russia and other foreign governments began to increase efforts to generate confusion and social division… as well as to support the election of their favorite candidate.
Dictators love the Internet. We learned this with vivid clarity from a seditious attack on the U.S. Capitol… incited by the U.S. President, supported by his base, and led by known anarchists and Republicans who were willing to trade their dignity for visions of taking over control of the country.
In general, communication became so difficult in this social media-shaped and information-saturated world that we cannot count on journalists and other media professionals to advance our democratic republic for us. Rather, we must rely on public service-driven political leaders and their supporters to do that. Our next president therefore has a huge challenge ahead… and he will need all the help from us he can get.
Have not read yet but emails to both my addresses end up at same place so no need to send twice
Dennis Scifres Cell 817 239-0600
Brilliant Larry. Could not have said it better myself; in fact, could not have said it as well! I am encouraged by the nascent trend of corporate generated restraints on the spreading of lies and incitements to violence. Of course, the 1st amendment makes govt restraints tricky. Here’s a thought for you: Maybe the FCC could bring the internet and social media under its jurisdiction (requiring licensing, etc)?
Dennis Scifres Cell 817 239-0600
I hope, Larry, that the news media has learned that lazy journalism isn’t helpful. It’s not useful to just get a quote from one side and get a quote from the other side, and then think the job is done. It isn’t. That’s not objectivity, that’s laziness.